How Did Brands Become a Thing? – Part II

How Did Brands Become a Thing? – Part II

In my last blog post I explained how brands emerged. While businesses got the idea of marking goods from the cattle industry, the cattle industry took the word “brand” from businesses. 
Idea:          cattle farmers              –>          business
Word:       business                       –>          cattle farmers

The English word “brand” derives from the old German word “brandaz” meaning “to burn.”
– In the 1400s we used “brand” as a noun meaning a mark made on a criminal with a hot iron. 
– In the mid 1500s alcohol makers began marking their casks with a hot iron and called it a “brand.” 
– The English language did not start calling the marks made on cattle a brand until the late 1500s.

Trivia: The oldest brand that has remained in constant use is Stella Artois.  It dates back to 1366!

Once the practice of branding became more widespread, various legal systems enacted laws to protect a wider range of products.  Some early laws include:

England
– In the 12th century King Edward the First enacted a law prohibiting jewelers from selling their creations unless each piece included a stamp from the Goldsmith’s Hall (a royal office in London). Any jeweler who attempted to create a counterfeit hallmark was executed. 
– In the 13th century King Henry III enacted the Bakers Marking Law.  It required bakers to add a distinctive mark to all bread sold. Bakers who failed to comply with the Bakers Marking Law risked heavy fines and the possibility of having to forfeit all unmarked bread.

France
– In the 14th century the French passed an edict prohibiting innkeepers from selling common wine under a fraudulent label.  The penalty was death. 
– In the late 14th century France passed another edict which essentially enforced the guild’s rules.  The penalty for placing someone else’s design on your goods was to have your hands cut off. 

Don’t worry— modern trademark law does not include death and dismemberment as punishment for infringement.  However, some of the penalties can kill your business, and you don’t even need to know you are an infringer to face these penalties.

How Did Brands Become a Thing?

How Did Brands Become a Thing?

We all know what a brand is. Wikipedia defines it as:
“a name, term, design, symbol or any other feature that distinguishes one seller’s good or service from those of other sellers.” 

The key word is “distinguish.” You don’t have a brand unless you are distinct. Once the public determines they like your product, your brand is what allows them to come back for more. 

The idea of using a distinctive design to signify ownership was borrowed from the cattle industry. 
– there are cave drawings over 17,000 years old that show animals with marks made on them, and
– the Egyptians marked their cattle with hot irons as far back as 2700 BC. 

This concept was borrowed by artisans in Egypt, China and Europe. For example, the European guilds of the middle ages assigned unique designs to craftsmen who made objects such as silver, China, furniture and pottery. 

The designs helped both the buyers and the craftsmen. 
– The buyers knew what quality they should expect from certain craftsmen, and
– the craftsmen were able to charge more if their goods were higher quality.

The guilds recognized this value and would banish anyone from the guild if they placed someone else’s design on their goods. Over time, the practice of placing unique designs on objects extended to a broader range of goods offered for sale including oil, wine, cosmetics and fish sauce. 

Last Call for… Jelly?

Last Call for… Jelly?

In my last post I included something my high school daughter wrote for me. Many people asked how she learned about the problems #entrepreneurs face with trademark concerns. Simple! She did a little research!

My daughter told me that she found a story about a bar in Oregon that had to change its name because it was too similar to another #brand. She went on to explain that the original name for the bar was identical to that of a jelly company. Say what???

I snooped behind her and confirmed her story. Justy’s Jelly forced Justy’s Bar and Grill to change its name to Lifty’s.

So many things…. Where do I start?

1. I highly doubt Justy’s Bar and Grill performed a search before opening. If they had completed this basic process, they would have known that Justy’s Jelly existed. If they knew Justy’s Jelly existed, they would have either:
– Chosen a different name; or (more likely)
– Used the Justy’s Bar and Grill name knowing that their services are not closely related to jelly.

2. You generally can’t force a company in an unrelated field to change its name. To me, jelly and bar and grill restaurants are quite distinct. They both deal with food, but they are on opposite sides of the spectrum. Maybe I could understand this if Justy’s was a famous brand or was a fanciful term, but this fact pattern is nonsensical to me.

3. The only way Justy’s Jelly won this was that they took the bar and grill by surprise. Or maybe they simply “lawyered up” and the bar and grill wasn’t willing to follow suit.

The simple matter is that the bar and grill was caught off guard, or didn’t care to defend itself. A brand health check would have prevented this. I offer this check for $275. Or, thanks to my 2023 incentive, it would have been $250 since Justy’s is in the food and beverage industry. They would have been aware of the jelly guys, and known that their claims didn’t gel. Also, they would have known to call me to help resolve the issue.

A Message From the Next Generation

A Message From the Next Generation

Last week I had the pleasure of taking my high school senior #daughter to visit #Auburn. During the trip we talked about her plans to go into #PR and compared it to my use of LinkedIn. She wrote this for me, which I also posted on LinkedIn:

#trademark infringement can throw a wrench in the plans of any business. Even a well-established business can suffer huge financial and time- consuming consequences from being found liable.

When a business is created, the first step is to get their name out there. The hope is that people- once knowing the business exists- will chose to go there the next time the business can fulfill their needs. Once a business successfully gets their name into the marketplace, changing it can be catastrophic.

To protect your small business from the financial consequences of a rebranding, a simple step can be taken. Conducting a trademark search can save major amounts of time and money.

Protecting your small business isn’t difficult if you take the right steps to ensure you are legally protected even before opening your doors.

While it may seem like an optional and unnecessary cost, it could possibly help you save thousands in legal fees and total rebranding later. Everyone starting a business should consider a trademark search and registration before even settling on a name.

Parody (and Dog Toys) as Art

Parody (and Dog Toys) as Art

The most recent blog post mentioned that both technology and freedom of expression have changed brand protection in the past 20 years.  It doesn’t help that these two areas often butt heads.

The post explained that Hermes successfully stopped someone from selling MetaBirkins—NFTs that looked like Birkin bags.  While that is true, I’m waiting on the appeal.

This summer the Supreme Court should decide a case that may provide a great defense—parody.  The high court will decide whether a company that sells dog toys is infringing the rights of Jack Daniels Distillery.  No, I have not been drinking.

Jack Daniels sued a company that sold stuffed toys that look like a bottle of Jack Daniels. The toy had “Bad Spaniels” written where “Jack Daniels” would normally appear and the classic line “the Old No. 2 on your Tennessee Carpet.”  The toy company won.  The lower court held that the Rogers Test allows the toy company the right to use Jack Daniels’ branding. Reminder, I have not been drinking.

The Rogers Test applies the First Amendment and ignores the normal “likelihood of confusion” analysis.  Under this, Jack Daniels had to show the dog toy’s use of “Bad Spaniels” either (1) was “not artistically relevant to the underlying work” or (2) “explicitly misleads consumers as to the source or content of the work.”  This test normally applies to artistic uses of brands, but the Supreme Court will decide if this test also applies to parodies.  Watch this space!

Conventional wisdom holds that if Jack Daniels loses, this means the Rogers Test has been expanded.  If this happens, the NFT owner will surely appeal its loss to Hermes.